Speed of ascent during stair climbing identifies operable lung resection candidates.

BACKGROUND Preoperative evaluation of lung resection candidates with impaired pulmonary reserves includes measurement of aerobic capacity. Stair climbing is an attractive low-cost alternative to treadmill exercise testing but it lacks standardisation. OBJECTIVES To directly compare stair climbing and treadmill exercise testing with respect to an established cut-off value for lung resection. METHODS We subjected 56 lung resection candidates to both symptom-limited treadmill exercise testing and stair climbing to a maximum of 20 m. Both exercise tests were monitored with the same portable spiroergometer. Subjects were on average 46.6 years old, 61% were male and 54% had FEV(1)/FVC < 70%. Mean FEV(1) and DLCO(c) were 51.6 and 57.1%, respectively. RESULTS Mean altitude reached, exercise time, speed of ascent and peak VO(2) were 16.9 m, 74 s, 14.7 m/min and 22.4 ml/min/kg, respectively, in 54 subjects completing stair climbing. Thirty-one subjects (58%) reached 20 m without stopping. Treadmill tests were completed by 51 subjects and lasted longer (432 s; p < 0.001), but VO(2max) was not different compared to stair climbing (22.7 ml/min/kg; p = 0.673). Speed of ascent was significantly correlated to both stair climbing peak VO(2) (r = 0.63) and treadmill VO(2max) (r = 0.67). All 19 subjects (34%) who reached 20 m in 80 s or less (≥15 m/min) had a VO(2max) of ≥20 ml/min/kg. CONCLUSIONS We found a clinically useful correlation between speed of ascent during stair climbing and VO(2max) during treadmill exercise testing. Climbing to 20 m with an average speed of ascent of ≥15 m/min accurately identified subjects qualifying for pneumonectomy according to established criteria.